Growth & Digital/008 · Experimentation
EDIT VIA GITHUB · /content
Planning008 · Experimentation

008 · Experimentation

The standing rule made real: measured changes ship against controls — Growthbook infra live, a weekly cadence, and a dedicated experimentation contractor from November

WHERE THE WORK HAPPENS
008 · Experimentation in Asana
Tasks, owners, and day-to-day updates live on the Asana board. This page is the summary view.
https://app.asana.com/1/20567807697952/project/1208977213277305
Open in Asana
THE BRIEF
edit content/projects/experimentation.md

What this is

Experimentation as the layer under everything: the H2 plan's standing rule — measured changes ship against controls, and contested decisions get settled with data. The infrastructure already exists (Growthbook wired through Next.js middleware, with duplicate-any-page A/B capability — WM built it in April); this project turns infrastructure into a program: an operating doc, a weekly cadence, and a dedicated Growth Specialist, Experimentation contractor once agency contracts end in November. First ship (memo): operating doc + weekly cadence.

Goal: testing as infrastructure — every landing page ships A/B-by-default, and the roadmap's contested calls get decided by lift, not seniority.

Why now

The H2 plan runs on measured lift: treated destination pages against locked baselines, the first user-flow optimization behind a test, paid's two-variable testing system, the activation journey shipped behind a test. All of that assumes a working experimentation rail with an owner — and today the rail exists but the program doesn't. The GA4 sign-off (Data & tracking) makes results trustworthy at exactly the right moment.

The program, per piece

  • The operating doc — what qualifies as a test, how tests pre-register, minimum run lengths, who calls results, and the two-variable-per-test / judged-by-concept rule from the paid system generalized.
  • The weekly cadence — a standing review: what launched, what read out, what ships next; program memory so learning compounds instead of evaporating.
  • The infrastructure, owned — Growthbook + the Next.js middleware rail (any editor duplicates a page, links it to an experiment, and the test runs) maintained in-house post-WM; the LP testing strategy (web workflow, Month 2) runs on it.
  • The contractor (November) — the Growth Specialist, Experimentation: plan-design-build-test, the fractional owner who keeps velocity when the founding energy fades.
  • The portfolio — tests spanning web, landing pages, email (the activation test), and paid (the format experiments), all reading from the same GA4/warehouse truth.

Work to be done

  • Operating doc + weekly cadence live — the rules published, the review running, tests pre-registering — the first ship.
  • The rail owned in-house — Growthbook infrastructure transferred from WM knowledge to documented ownership; LP testing running through it from Month 2.
  • The contractor onboarded and the portfolio pacing — the experimentation specialist in seat (Nov), a standing test portfolio across web/LP/email/paid with results feeding the weekly attainment story.

Current state

Standing up as the transitions complete: the infrastructure is live (WM-built), the operating doc + cadence is the first ship, and the contractor line opens in November. The website bet's baseline-lock discipline is already the program's method applied.

Dependencies & risks

WM's infrastructure knowledge must transfer before Oct 31 (rides the Storybook ownership doc). Result trust depends on the GA4 sign-off — no sign-off, no believable lift. Until the contractor lands, cadence ownership sits with Scott's pod — keep the weekly light or it won't survive the gap. [owner to complete]

What this is

Experimentation as the layer under everything: the H2 plan's standing rule — measured changes ship against controls, and contested decisions get settled with data. The infrastructure already exists (Growthbook wired through Next.js middleware, with duplicate-any-page A/B capability — WM built it in April); this project turns infrastructure into a program: an operating doc, a weekly cadence, and a dedicated Growth Specialist, Experimentation contractor once agency contracts end in November. First ship (memo): operating doc + weekly cadence.

Goal: testing as infrastructure — every landing page ships A/B-by-default, and the roadmap's contested calls get decided by lift, not seniority.

Why now

The H2 plan runs on measured lift: treated destination pages against locked baselines, the first user-flow optimization behind a test, paid's two-variable testing system, the activation journey shipped behind a test. All of that assumes a working experimentation rail with an owner — and today the rail exists but the program doesn't. The GA4 sign-off (Data & tracking) makes results trustworthy at exactly the right moment.

The program, per piece

  • The operating doc — what qualifies as a test, how tests pre-register, minimum run lengths, who calls results, and the two-variable-per-test / judged-by-concept rule from the paid system generalized.
  • The weekly cadence — a standing review: what launched, what read out, what ships next; program memory so learning compounds instead of evaporating.
  • The infrastructure, owned — Growthbook + the Next.js middleware rail (any editor duplicates a page, links it to an experiment, and the test runs) maintained in-house post-WM; the LP testing strategy (web workflow, Month 2) runs on it.
  • The contractor (November) — the Growth Specialist, Experimentation: plan-design-build-test, the fractional owner who keeps velocity when the founding energy fades.
  • The portfolio — tests spanning web, landing pages, email (the activation test), and paid (the format experiments), all reading from the same GA4/warehouse truth.

Work to be done

  • Operating doc + weekly cadence live — the rules published, the review running, tests pre-registering — the first ship.
  • The rail owned in-house — Growthbook infrastructure transferred from WM knowledge to documented ownership; LP testing running through it from Month 2.
  • The contractor onboarded and the portfolio pacing — the experimentation specialist in seat (Nov), a standing test portfolio across web/LP/email/paid with results feeding the weekly attainment story.

Current state

Standing up as the transitions complete: the infrastructure is live (WM-built), the operating doc + cadence is the first ship, and the contractor line opens in November. The website bet's baseline-lock discipline is already the program's method applied.

Dependencies & risks

WM's infrastructure knowledge must transfer before Oct 31 (rides the Storybook ownership doc). Result trust depends on the GA4 sign-off — no sign-off, no believable lift. Until the contractor lands, cadence ownership sits with Scott's pod — keep the weekly light or it won't survive the gap.

OWNER
SW
Scott Weaver
Sr Manager, Web Engineering & Digital Experience
EXTERNAL OWNER
GS
Growth Specialist, Experimentation (TBH)
Contractor · plan-design-build-test
TIMELINE
Contractor line opens Nov
Stands up as the WM/GrowthX transitions complete
AGENCY / CONTRACTOR
Growth Specialist, Experimentation — contractor TBH (plan-design-build-test)
Fractional owner line opens as agency contracts end (Nov)
WORKSTREAM
008 · Experimentation Redis internal
CONTRIBUTORS
SWSMSR
Scott Weaver · Sr Mgr Growth (TBH) · Stalin Ramos